For the past five years, Aaron Niederhelman has been involved in architecting financial vehicles that use capitalism to reinstate nourishment back into food. Using economic incentive in line with evolving market forces to transition from a current production process fraught with contamination & waste in a rapid enough cadence to rectify human and environmental health through-out, it’s the inevitable that future investment will increasingly lean circular. As early adopters, the current challenge faced is finding profitable initiatives disruptive to food, water, and waste not in a same conventional genre, but instead by backing pragmatic and systemic innovation focused on food system reform as risk mitigation to US production.
Circular Economies: Part 1
The objective of any circular economy is to reduce the expense of waste in macro & micro environments. This core competency of ecology has been proven to be the keys to the kingdom in developing a fiscally sound approach to a sustainable and not linear future. Investment in circular economies in lockstep with regenerative natural systems can be made in: (i) food system, (ii) resilient agriculture, (iii) sustainable fisheries, (iv) water utilization and (v) alternative energy – where each industry becomes increasingly reliant on narrowing the expense of the energy loop.
Servicing natural order with circular agriculture practice has net positive results. What seems lost to the masses is the knowledge and/or accountability to the fact that current Cheap Food will be impetus for a forced evolution broadly more circular. The fix comes from an ongoing evaluation of system health. Instead of externalities continuously swept under the rug, each link in the chain is given a calculation of wellbeing in determining a true cost of food. When these current externalized costs become realized, the opportunity is to leverage systemic innovations in production that reduce capital expenditures allocated to waste, and even better, institute additional revenue streams via closing the loop as current waste becomes an energy input and key link in the chain for a complementary circular economy.
Circular Economies: Part 2
We need commitment and infrastructure to evaluate specific agricultural practices deemed most unsafe and/or concerning to our nutritional and national security. Future global competitiveness will be based on a deepening understanding of the laws of natural order. The opportunity to continue to lead comes from adoption of this reality, by thinking alternatively to our current linear and wasteful process by mitigating mounting risk associated to a shrinking planet. Long-horizon investors thus must take ownership of proven innovations that diversify our production portfolios of clean food, water and energy to remain responsible to their stakeholders. This approach becomes increasingly circular in thinking and practice with broader investment professional & stakeholder commitment.
Tendering recommendation and strategies for gaining public & private partnership, with the (i) Entrepreneur Agrarian Fund, (ii) Ecology Management Systems, in essays (iii) atWhatCost – Aaron Niederhelman explores how doing well by doing great good is the inevitable future of investing in food production. Through empowering societal awareness to make better decisions in controlling their own well-being & financial state – immersive circular and holistic economies bolstered public & private investment pay for the future of human and planetary health through better agricultural practice. These investments in systemic & technological innovations result in healthy, accessible and fiscally savvy nutrient value for more. Through which, we return food from an afterthought of human existence to a cornerstone of wellbeing & longevity.
Simply, Aaron explains “We must start acting like responsible adults in managing this inherited dowery of earth’s fertility. That’s just commonsense that seems to get strained by tainted short-horizon perspective, hubris and blind credulity. As part of any estate planning, how is the health of the planet not of greatest concern in passing wealth & security to generations next? Without accounting for the basis of all future economies, the premise of the plan is intrinsically flawed.”